Bike Test: Specialized Enduro Pro

Vernon Feltons Specialized Enduro Pro review.

By Vernon Felton
Specialized Enduro Pro
$5,800 /

The Enduro has been a mainstay of the Specialized line for more than a decade, and in that time it’s morphed from a gangly dualie with an anemic 4.5 inches of rear squish, to the space-age gravity beast you see here. When Specialized designed this latest iteration of the Enduro, they essentially took their freeride SX Trail model and carved a new version out of carbon fiber and carefully sculpted aluminum. The end result? Six-plus inches of downhill prowess in a flyweight package.

Tipping the scales at just a hair more than 28 pounds, the Enduro Pro is the number-two bike in the five-bike Enduro lineup. As such, it’s decked out in a no-holds-barred component kit. Highlights here include the Specialized E160TA Future Shock fork (complete with one-piece carbon fiber crown and steerer), SRAM X0 carbon-fiber crankset, Specialized travel-adjust seatpost, custom Avid Elixir R CR SL disc brakes, replaceable ISCG mounts and a Gamut shift guide.

One new addition to the Enduro is a custom rear shock: The Fox RP23-S, which has a single, firm Climb mode and three separate low-speed compression adjustments for the Descending mode. In short, while your garden-variety RP23 is configured so that you can adjust how well your bike climbs, this unique shock is tuned so that you can tweak how well the Enduro descends. And that, right there, says a hell of a lot about this bike.

The Enduro is a holy terror—in the best possible way—on the downhills. Though it usually takes a few rides before I adjust to a bike’s quirks and become comfortable hanging it all out, I immediately felt at home on the Enduro. The relaxed geometry (66.5-degree headtube angle and 70.5-degree seat-tube angle), low bottom bracket and short chainstays combine to give the Enduro confident, yet decidedly nimble, handling. Both front and rear suspension are butter-smooth on everything from minor stutter bumps to massive hits.

Surprisingly, the bike also gains elevation quite well. The Enduro’s very active FSR design is nowhere near as efficient under pedaling forces as some other suspension designs, so you definitely need to slap the rear shock’s little blue lever into Climb mode and drop the fork into its shorter-travel setting to keep the front wheel from wandering. Once you’ve done these things, however, the Enduro’s lack of heft and deft handling make it a very capable climber.

Could the Enduro be improved? Absolutely. While the rear end is admirably stout, it could be better still with a lightweight through-axle setup—something along the lines of the 142×12-millimeter system that Specialized has already grafted onto a few of their Epic models. Add that one element to the Enduro and you’d be hard pressed to find a better all-mountain bike.

Add a Comment

  • David

    That’s not a 2012 Enduro and they don’t make a “Pro” model. It should be the Enduro “Expert” Carbon which also has done away with s specialized front fork for a Fox 36 Talas R.

    All you have to do is look on the website to figure that out??? WTF?

  • Peter Fal

    It is a 2011 model. Kind of dated review guys.
    For example, the 2012 now has a 142 X 12 rear axle.

    Now a back to back review with the 2012 model would be interesting.

  • vernon

    Indeed, this is a 2011 Enduro Pro. This review first showed up in the magazine in the middle of 2011 and you’re seeing it online now because, well, frankly there are still 2011 bikes in shops and when this thing was posted online, it was still 2011.

    On top of that, most of us magazine editors just started testing 2012 product in late October, so at this early point in the year, there’s little in the way of in-depth reviews of 2012 bikes. The exception, of course, are the 24 bikes we featured in the Bible of Bike Tests issue (in which case, we spent all of October trail testing those bikes in Pisgah.

    For the record, I heartily second Peter’s notion: a back to back review of this bike and the 2012 model with the 142×12 rear end would be great. The traditional QR was the only weakness to this great bike. When you combine that much travel with that many pivots, you need a thru axle to stiffen things up. Simple as that, really.

    Another interesting potential review: compare the Enduro to the Stumpy EVO. The 2012 EVO is amazing. It’s practically as capable as the Enduro on the descents (not quite, as it rocks a 32 fork instead of a Lyrik or 36) and is a far better climber. It’s pricey as hell, but absolutely stunning. If you are considering the Enduro, but spend a lot of time climbing, definitely check out the 2012 Stumpy EVO.

    Thanks, guys, for the posts.

The Connect

Instagram - @bikemag